@5ivebanger
I think it’s interesting that, intentionally or not, your shots of the watches side-by-side would alternate in terms of which side the watches were placed. I found that my eye naturally gravitated toward the Tudor, in terms of what I found pleasing. Almost a Rorschach-esque effect. Nicely done, if intended. Otherwise, an interesting litmus test for the eye. Beauty truly is in the eye of the beholder.
@Scan_Speak
I've wanted a no date Submariner forever. Now that I can afford one......I'm conflicted. As much as I would like to own a Rolex, I simply don't want to be seen wearing a Rolex. Anyways, thats my story.
@HarveyHanerfeld
Here's my take and behavior. Over the last 6 months I have purchased at retail the Tudor Ranger, Tudor Monochrome and Tudor BB58 GMT for a total retail price of $12,300. That's the approximate grey market pricing of the no date sub. Pricing of the GMT and the monochrome is the same as the retail of the sub. The Rolex is ridiculously overpriced for what it is (I have owned a sub 16610 for 3 decades and love it-so I'm no Rolex hater). My new 3 watch collection will bring much more happiness than a single modern sub. Each of my new Tudors is fabulous and distinct and worn in different settings. I don't value the "Rolex Status" at all, and so 3 for the price of one works great for me.
@gregcarnall9097
I have the Monochrome and love it, ive also found the movement to be less than 0.5 secs a day so pretty solid. I also prefer the matt bezel and dial, i think the roles looks a little too shiny!!
@timmanion7459
I have a number of different models of Rolex Submariner , starting with my first one , a 5513 , and just about every model up to my 124060. I purchased a Tudor Black Bay smiley face Black on black, and more recently a Tudor Black Bay monochrome. I find myself wearing this particular watch more and more . Absolutely love that watch. Great video Bruce .
@granthaley867
I think the burgundy is the one to go for. It has its own identity and is unique to Tudor in the Rolex/Tudor family. While the monochrome is a lovely watch, in the back of your mind, would you always be wondering if you should have spent the extra on the sub?
@dsmlive3982
I purchased my monochrome on the jubilee during Brent Millers VIP cave event. What a watch! I also enjoy my 2020 sub date. I can have the vintage no date feel . Both represent differently.
@jeremydahm2124
The Sub and Datejust are 2 Rolex models that are first and foremost a Rolex in my opinion. You will not wear either without people knowing you're wearing a 10 thousand dollar watch, with look at what I have, brand baggage and judgement. I love Rolex but this is true even in Manhattan. Maybe more so here. The Sub is not under the radar in anyway. The Tudor is the choice if you already have a super case Rolex with shiny ceramic. But if you want a Sub, nothing else will satisfy you. Waits are shortening. Momma loves shortening : )
@jspeakman53
I prefer the more understated elegance of the Tudor, its slender lugs and lack of crown guards harking back to its vintage toolish origins. The Rolex sadly has become too shouty, 'look at me' for my taste.
@frtorres87
Tudor has quickly become my favorite watch brand for one specific reason, the watches are actually available. Is the Rolex Submariner a superior watch? I’d say so. Is it worth playing the AD games? I don’t think so.
@Anditspee
Basically the Rolex is 20% nicer for double the price. Whether that’s worth it or not is down to the buyer ;)
@alnadaf
I owned the BB41 black with in-house movement for three years and was forced to sell it after 3 years of ownership. I bought the BB58 black in May with rivet bracelet in May brand new and managed to get a £200 discount. I'm keeping it but compared to the BB41 I had it feels underwhelming. Last month I purchased the Monochrome with 5 link bracelet. It is 5 months old and in absolutely pristine condition. I bought that for around £2700 compared to the £3900 price for a new one. It is an unbelievable watch.
@jonnypescado1
I've never owned a Rolex, but did recently get the BB Burgandy Mk3 on 5 link (it's the ONLY diver I'd consider on 5 link/Jubilee. I don't know why it works on this one, but it does). Here's my question: I believe the Tudor Burgandy belongs in a collection ALONGSIDE a Sub. Does the Burgandy belong in a collection with the Monochrome? I don't know. What say y'all?
@BPFnSC
I own the newest version of the Rolex Submariner Date that I got from my local AD. Knowing what I know now, if this Tudor had been around when I was looking to buy my first luxury watch, the Tudor on jubilee would have been my pick.
@Jamesdhillegas
Great side by side shots Bruce. The Sub finishing to my eye is so much crisper and noticeable. Love Tudor and own a Pelagos but between these two for me it has to be the Sub.
@MrDucatiti
No.1 rule in this hobby: Do not settle.
@daviddeavours4909
I just got the Black Bay Mono for Christmas (thanks "Santa" !). Honestly I simply would not buy the Rolex version at this point. Tudor makes a better product for less than half the retail cost of the Rolex, without having to jump through hoops or over pay on the secondary market. I've been a Rolex owner since 1999 and I simply won't by another Rolex given the market and the AD disposition today.
@seanpat5735
As someone whos owned a sub for a while now, and recently bought the monochrome. I am now considering selling the Rolex. The monochrome does everything I want a black diver to do. I also bought the rubber osyterflex style strap with it and man that is a gamechanger. On par with the oysterflex 100%. As others have said, $5k youre getting pretty much the exact same thing minus the Rolex name. And to me, that doesnt really matter. I know Rolex snobs will disagree.
@AbbotHolzhauer
Great video, very accurate analysis. In my 4.5 years in the game as a watch collector and enthusiast, I collected a lot from :yt:MAMACOO:yt: I was thinking I was able to get a blue SD but I'm not vip enough, but I'm not giving up. Hehe. Great video.
@thebestoffools