@ericapilatinapoli4444
Wow, this video is such an intelligent and stimulating talk, thank you for this.
@curtdilger6235
Thanks for your thought provoking video. I've enjoyed your videos on this channel, which are consistently well produced and bolstered with your original drawings. I think the main issue regarding starchitects is man's need for monuments, memorable artifacts that shape and define a city's identity. The appearance of the building in the texture of the city is the first primary function a public building must address, because millions see the building and far fewer actually use it.
@that1fred
Great video, great critique
@sinisasimic70
This video is in essence a critique of modern post capitalist society where we tend to focus on slogans. We can see it everywhere. Thank you for this eye opening video.
@SebastianOcampo-dm1on
Love this videos, keep going please
@ArthurStone
Thank you; informative presentation with great visuals to illustrate. I think 'design-by-committee' approaches (to anything) can either result in a dysfunctional hodge-podge or, depending on the power-relations of the committee, end up as the most forceful or convincing 'single-vision' (akin to the Starchitect method). I'm reminded of the restaurant/chef trade and the saying 'someone has to be the fascist in the kitchen' (meaning that a successful operation often requires a forceful character to restrict and motivate). Sometimes committee's work well too. Perhaps there is room for many approaches to architecture?
@acubeadvertisements5099
thanks for this video...
@victormolchanov8404
Отличное видео, спасибо автору, понятно и красиво!
@sakethchinthakindi5105
Perfect perfect !!!
@SirKombabomba
:text-green-game-over::person-turqouise-waving:Lets go back to BASIC APPROACH to THE DESIGN-Awesome video Thanx!!
@ahmadalamoori9372
over all a very nice video for sure ... for me i would add on this great list Daniel libeskind for sure ..
@austingwatson
i like that my city, Seattle got 3 mentions in this video.
@craig2493
The starchitects' buildings, like flashy new sci-fi movies, often cower commoners through their brazen self-assurance. They are over-sized spectacles that enrage staid grouches and inspire the humble. Who can help but react?
@TheVincent0268
It is Rem Koolhaas (cabbage hare)
@jpp1960
Great video thought the DEI argument is problematic, prizes and projects should be won by the most talented regardless of ethnicity and gender, so far i believe most have been fair
@_Breakdown
Thanks for a great video. Only disagree on 2 points: (1) the APPEARANCE (BEAUTY) of a building/structure is what SPEAKS TO PEOPLE FOREMOST (not conceptual ideas about space or utility). (2) "diversity, equity + inclusion" are COUNTERFEIT VIRTUES. VIRTUE is HARD - - that's why its rare and revered. COMPLAINING is EASY. NO ONE IS TRYING TO PREVENT WOMEN OR ANY ETHNIC OR RACIAL GROUP FROM DOING ANYTHING - - how is the color of someone's skin going to endow them with creativity? How is someone's sex going to help them create a building or a bridge? VICTIM-BRAINWASHING has seeped into the culture through college professors who most likely CAN'T do the work that PROFESSIONALS DO - - so they invent reasons to criticize those who are doing it. Frank Lloyd Wright was not a committee - - and he NEVER WENT TO SCHOOL FOR ARCHITECTURE.
@jonatanfogelquist
You forgot Ando...
@guillermosahuquillo4499
The more “starchitecty” the building, the more maintenance needed, the deeper the money pit. Bring back rationalism.
@TheSigil
Thank you for telling me how we ended up with that pathetic empire State building
@ankitshrestha6909