This Reddit post from the professor is raw, emotional, and incredibly important. It captures the real tension educators are feeling in the age of generative AI. Here's a short breakdown of the main themes — and why it matters for everyone:
🔍 The Human Toll of AI in Education
This isn’t just about cheating — it’s about trust breaking down.
“I actually get excited when I find typos and grammatical errors in their writing now.”
That's heartbreaking. Professors should be mentors, not suspicious detectives. AI is shifting educators' roles in a way that feels dehumanizing on both ends.
🏛️ The Danger of Confidently Wrong AI
Especially in specialized fields like ancient history, the tools can be dangerously misleading:
“Non-existent quotes from ancient texts that the class supposedly read together…”
When AI makes up facts or citations (a problem called AI hallucination), it creates a false sense of confidence — and it’s incredibly easy for students to copy/paste without noticing.
🧠 The Real Purpose of Education
“I don’t want you to learn facts. I want you to think.”
That’s it. The core of a humanities education is critical thinking, insight, and originality — not information recall.
But tools like ChatGPT (when misused) shortcut the very process students are supposed to grow through.
🤔 What Can Be Done?
This post isn’t anti-AI. It’s anti-lazy-thinking. The real solution isn't banning tools — it’s rethinking how we teach with them:
Assignments that require personal reflection, in-class dialogue, or step-by-step process tracking.
Teaching students to use AI critically, like a calculator or spell-checker — not a ghostwriter.
Valuing messiness in student work — because that’s where learning actually happens.
💬 What’s Your Take?
Should AI be banned from academic writing?
Or should we integrate it, with guardrails?
Are traditional essays becoming obsolete?
#AIinEducation #ChatGPT #AcademicIntegrity #CriticalThinking #HumanitiesMatters #ProfessorsOfReddit #DigitalEthics #FutureOfLearning #ViralAI #chatgpt4
コメント